<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was dismissed, affirming that penalties cannot be imposed on adhoc additions without substantial evidence, in line with established legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was dismissed, affirming that penalties cannot be imposed on adhoc additions without substantial evidence, in line with established legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>