<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 116 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23094</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the petitioners had made a voluntary and truthful disclosure of income, emphasizing that the revised returns were filed to rectify a specific issue and did not indicate a lack of good faith. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed unjust, and a fresh assessment was directed. The Court made the rule absolute without imposing any costs on the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 116 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23094</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the petitioners had made a voluntary and truthful disclosure of income, emphasizing that the revised returns were filed to rectify a specific issue and did not indicate a lack of good faith. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed unjust, and a fresh assessment was directed. The Court made the rule absolute without imposing any costs on the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>