<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23092</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the direction given by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was unwarranted and redundant. The Court emphasized the necessity for directions to be directly involved in the case&#039;s disposal and cited the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Rajinder Nath v. CIT. The judgment clarified limitations on directions by authorities in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23092</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the direction given by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was unwarranted and redundant. The Court emphasized the necessity for directions to be directly involved in the case&#039;s disposal and cited the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Rajinder Nath v. CIT. The judgment clarified limitations on directions by authorities in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>