<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>INDEPENDENCE OF IRP OR RP VIS A VIS CORPORATE CREDITOR- SUPREME COURT REVERSE ORDER OF NCALT – views of author find approval- however, author request honorable judges that reasoned and elaborate judgments to avoid further disputes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9444</link>
    <description>The document addresses whether Interim/Resolution Professionals must be independent only from the corporate debtor or also from corporate creditors, noting statutory protection focuses on debtor independence. A three-judge order in a recent insolvency matter found the tribunal&#039;s disqualification of a Resolution Professional for prior service with a creditor to be incorrect, directed appointment of a new professional, and stated the tribunal order should not be treated as precedent. The author warns that the court&#039;s brief prima facie reasoning and lack of statutory discussion may provoke further disputes and urges fully reasoned judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:09:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>INDEPENDENCE OF IRP OR RP VIS A VIS CORPORATE CREDITOR- SUPREME COURT REVERSE ORDER OF NCALT – views of author find approval- however, author request honorable judges that reasoned and elaborate judgments to avoid further disputes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9444</link>
      <description>The document addresses whether Interim/Resolution Professionals must be independent only from the corporate debtor or also from corporate creditors, noting statutory protection focuses on debtor independence. A three-judge order in a recent insolvency matter found the tribunal&#039;s disqualification of a Resolution Professional for prior service with a creditor to be incorrect, directed appointment of a new professional, and stated the tribunal order should not be treated as precedent. The author warns that the court&#039;s brief prima facie reasoning and lack of statutory discussion may provoke further disputes and urges fully reasoned judgments.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:09:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>