https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397791 The Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid for a works contract due to deficiencies in the tender submission, including failure to disclose tax details and provide necessary documents. It was determined that the award to the 5th respondent was justified as they met all requirements, unlike the petitioner. The Court dismissed allegations of favoritism, noting that discrepancies in the warranty period were resolved post-tender. The writ petition was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397791 The Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid for a works contract due to deficiencies in the tender submission, including failure to disclose tax details and provide necessary documents. It was determined that the award to the 5th respondent was justified as they met all requirements, unlike the petitioner. The Court dismissed allegations of favoritism, noting that discrepancies in the warranty period were resolved post-tender. The writ petition was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397791