<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23090</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the issues raised by the Department were already settled by previous court decisions, and no useful purpose would be served by referring the questions to the court for opinion. Therefore, the rule was discharged with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23090</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the issues raised by the Department were already settled by previous court decisions, and no useful purpose would be served by referring the questions to the court for opinion. Therefore, the rule was discharged with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>