<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23089</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the Commissioner of Income-tax had jurisdiction to initiate proceedings u/s 263 as there was only a partial merger of the assessment order. The revision pertained only to matters not considered and decided by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The court answered the question in the affirmative and in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23089</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the Commissioner of Income-tax had jurisdiction to initiate proceedings u/s 263 as there was only a partial merger of the assessment order. The revision pertained only to matters not considered and decided by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The court answered the question in the affirmative and in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>