<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 722 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 54F for the residential property at 183, Binanmangala, 2nd Stage, Bangalore. The Tribunal found that the second property was solely owned by the assessee&#039;s wife and did not trigger the proviso (ii) to section 54F, as the funds for the purchase came from her.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 722 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 54F for the residential property at 183, Binanmangala, 2nd Stage, Bangalore. The Tribunal found that the second property was solely owned by the assessee&#039;s wife and did not trigger the proviso (ii) to section 54F, as the funds for the purchase came from her.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>