<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 708 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397765</link>
    <description>Rejection of registration under sections 12A/12AA on the ground that the trust was carrying on commercial activities was sent back for fresh consideration, with the assessee directed to produce proper evidence before the Commissioner (Exemptions) and given a reasonable hearing. The Tribunal also held that the nationwide lockdown was an extraordinary period that could be excluded while computing the expected 90-day time limit for pronouncement under Rule 34(5) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. The registration issue was restored for adjudication afresh, and the lockdown period was treated as excludable for pronouncement-time computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 17:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 708 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397765</link>
      <description>Rejection of registration under sections 12A/12AA on the ground that the trust was carrying on commercial activities was sent back for fresh consideration, with the assessee directed to produce proper evidence before the Commissioner (Exemptions) and given a reasonable hearing. The Tribunal also held that the nationwide lockdown was an extraordinary period that could be excluded while computing the expected 90-day time limit for pronouncement under Rule 34(5) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. The registration issue was restored for adjudication afresh, and the lockdown period was treated as excludable for pronouncement-time computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>