https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23086 The appellate court allowed the appeal, overturning the trial court's decision and ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the defendant failed to prove the benami nature of the transaction and that the plaintiff had a rightful claim to the property. The case was remitted to the lower appellate court for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of properly pleading and proving benami transactions and the application of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23086 The appellate court allowed the appeal, overturning the trial court's decision and ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the defendant failed to prove the benami nature of the transaction and that the plaintiff had a rightful claim to the property. The case was remitted to the lower appellate court for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of properly pleading and proving benami transactions and the application of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23086