https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397757 The Tribunal determined that the Compensation Application filed under Section 53N of the Competition Act, 2002, by the Applicant was maintainable, rejecting the Respondents' arguments regarding the 'Doctrine of Merger' and the limitation period. It ruled that the application was filed within a reasonable timeframe, counting from the Supreme Court's judgment date, and allowed a single application against multiple respondents due to the commonality of the cause of action. The Tribunal instructed the Registry to verify the fee payment and allowed rectification if necessary, proceeding to schedule a hearing on the merits of other issues. en-us Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397757 The Tribunal determined that the Compensation Application filed under Section 53N of the Competition Act, 2002, by the Applicant was maintainable, rejecting the Respondents' arguments regarding the 'Doctrine of Merger' and the limitation period. It ruled that the application was filed within a reasonable timeframe, counting from the Supreme Court's judgment date, and allowed a single application against multiple respondents due to the commonality of the cause of action. The Tribunal instructed the Registry to verify the fee payment and allowed rectification if necessary, proceeding to schedule a hearing on the merits of other issues. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397757