<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 699 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397756</link>
    <description>The NCLT Ahmedabad&#039;s jurisdiction over matters from Madhya Pradesh was challenged post the 8th March 2019 Notification. Subsequent proceedings considered the notifications and territorial jurisdiction delineated by the Central Government for NCLT benches. The Notification dated 31st January 2020 reinstated Ahmedabad Bench&#039;s jurisdiction over Madhya Pradesh until the Indore Bench&#039;s operationalization. Despite challenges to the latter notification, the Tribunal found the Appeals infructuous due to it, leading to their disposal without costs. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to regulatory changes in jurisdictional matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 699 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397756</link>
      <description>The NCLT Ahmedabad&#039;s jurisdiction over matters from Madhya Pradesh was challenged post the 8th March 2019 Notification. Subsequent proceedings considered the notifications and territorial jurisdiction delineated by the Central Government for NCLT benches. The Notification dated 31st January 2020 reinstated Ahmedabad Bench&#039;s jurisdiction over Madhya Pradesh until the Indore Bench&#039;s operationalization. Despite challenges to the latter notification, the Tribunal found the Appeals infructuous due to it, leading to their disposal without costs. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to regulatory changes in jurisdictional matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>