https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397755 The NCLT upheld the appointment of a Special Officer to oversee an EOGM in a family company dispute under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, finding no illegality in the interim order. The NCLT emphasized the need to regulate company affairs in the interest of justice and shareholders, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing the applicability of Section 169 of the Companies Act, 2013. The judgment underscores the importance of resolving disputes and ensuring fair conduct in family-owned businesses within the legal framework provided by the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:33:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397755 The NCLT upheld the appointment of a Special Officer to oversee an EOGM in a family company dispute under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, finding no illegality in the interim order. The NCLT emphasized the need to regulate company affairs in the interest of justice and shareholders, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing the applicability of Section 169 of the Companies Act, 2013. The judgment underscores the importance of resolving disputes and ensuring fair conduct in family-owned businesses within the legal framework provided by the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397755