<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 694 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397751</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, directing the trial court to issue summons to Ms. Saradha Subbash as the company&#039;s representative under Section 305 of Cr.P.C. The trial was instructed to be completed within six months from the lifting of the lockdown. The court emphasized the necessity of proper company representation for prosecution to proceed, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim that he cannot be prosecuted without the company being represented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 694 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397751</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, directing the trial court to issue summons to Ms. Saradha Subbash as the company&#039;s representative under Section 305 of Cr.P.C. The trial was instructed to be completed within six months from the lifting of the lockdown. The court emphasized the necessity of proper company representation for prosecution to proceed, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim that he cannot be prosecuted without the company being represented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>