<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 692 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397749</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on Kodak film rolls supplied free of cost with cameras in a combi-pack was held admissible because the rolls were treated as accessories and therefore as input under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Their value formed part of the assessable value of the combi-pack, and the bundled clearance supported the conclusion that the goods were marketed in combined form. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 692 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397749</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on Kodak film rolls supplied free of cost with cameras in a combi-pack was held admissible because the rolls were treated as accessories and therefore as input under Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Their value formed part of the assessable value of the combi-pack, and the bundled clearance supported the conclusion that the goods were marketed in combined form. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>