https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397745 A quashing petition challenging prosecution sanction was held unsuitable for inherent jurisdiction because the complaint disclosed prima facie allegations of suppression of turnover and liability under fiscal and allied penal laws. The Court treated the competency of the sanctioning authority and other disputed factual matters as issues for trial, not for determination at the quashing stage. It also noted that the same objection had already been raised in discharge proceedings and revision, and viewed the renewed challenge as an abuse of process. The prosecution was allowed to continue, leaving all contested questions open for trial. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:16:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397745 A quashing petition challenging prosecution sanction was held unsuitable for inherent jurisdiction because the complaint disclosed prima facie allegations of suppression of turnover and liability under fiscal and allied penal laws. The Court treated the competency of the sanctioning authority and other disputed factual matters as issues for trial, not for determination at the quashing stage. It also noted that the same objection had already been raised in discharge proceedings and revision, and viewed the renewed challenge as an abuse of process. The prosecution was allowed to continue, leaving all contested questions open for trial. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397745