https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397742 The court quashed the impugned order dated 7.12.2019, granting the relief sought by the applicant due to a genuine settlement between the parties. The settlement, documented in a memorandum, involved payment by the applicant to withdraw the complaint and quash the conviction order. Applying Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the court emphasized the importance of allowing parties to compound offenses in cases of genuine settlement. Referring to judicial precedents, the court highlighted the compounding provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the wide jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397742 The court quashed the impugned order dated 7.12.2019, granting the relief sought by the applicant due to a genuine settlement between the parties. The settlement, documented in a memorandum, involved payment by the applicant to withdraw the complaint and quash the conviction order. Applying Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the court emphasized the importance of allowing parties to compound offenses in cases of genuine settlement. Referring to judicial precedents, the court highlighted the compounding provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the wide jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397742