<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (6) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289893</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition requesting the Income Tax Commissioner to refer legal questions to the High Court. The failure of a partner to provide essential details led to the case being treated as a &quot;no return&quot; scenario, justifying the dismissal. An appeal against the assessment made by the Income Tax Officer was rejected, as the partner did not comply with required information, leading to the assessment being finalized without necessary details. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing the case&#039;s classification as &quot;no return,&quot; rendering the appeal process inapplicable. The partner&#039;s inability to furnish essential information resulted in the dismissal of the petition, with costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (6) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289893</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition requesting the Income Tax Commissioner to refer legal questions to the High Court. The failure of a partner to provide essential details led to the case being treated as a &quot;no return&quot; scenario, justifying the dismissal. An appeal against the assessment made by the Income Tax Officer was rejected, as the partner did not comply with required information, leading to the assessment being finalized without necessary details. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing the case&#039;s classification as &quot;no return,&quot; rendering the appeal process inapplicable. The partner&#039;s inability to furnish essential information resulted in the dismissal of the petition, with costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>