<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed criminal revisions filed by the accused against the dismissal of discharge petitions under Section 245 of Cr.P.C. The court found prima facie allegations against the accused in the complaints and final reports, emphasizing that the focus should be on whether there are sufficient allegations to proceed with the case at the stage of deciding discharge petitions. The court ruled that the competency of the authority according sanction could be addressed during the trial and deemed the cited authority by the petitioner&#039;s counsel inapplicable. Charges were framed, and trial had commenced in all cases, leading to the dismissal of the revisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed criminal revisions filed by the accused against the dismissal of discharge petitions under Section 245 of Cr.P.C. The court found prima facie allegations against the accused in the complaints and final reports, emphasizing that the focus should be on whether there are sufficient allegations to proceed with the case at the stage of deciding discharge petitions. The court ruled that the competency of the authority according sanction could be addressed during the trial and deemed the cited authority by the petitioner&#039;s counsel inapplicable. Charges were framed, and trial had commenced in all cases, leading to the dismissal of the revisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>