https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887 At the discharge stage under Section 245 CrPC, the court examines only whether the complaint and final report disclose prima facie material to proceed, and it does not weigh the defence version. The objection that the sanctioning authority lacked competence was held to be a matter for trial on evidence, not for decision at discharge. As charges had already been framed and trial had begun, interference with the refusal to discharge was not warranted. The materials under Section 173 CrPC were found sufficient to justify continuation of the prosecution. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:38:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887 At the discharge stage under Section 245 CrPC, the court examines only whether the complaint and final report disclose prima facie material to proceed, and it does not weigh the defence version. The objection that the sanctioning authority lacked competence was held to be a matter for trial on evidence, not for decision at discharge. As charges had already been framed and trial had begun, interference with the refusal to discharge was not warranted. The materials under Section 173 CrPC were found sufficient to justify continuation of the prosecution. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289887