<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 744 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289874</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the period of limitation for filing the execution case should be counted from the date of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, determining the execution case filed within the twelve-year limitation period. The court set aside the previous order and directed the lower court to proceed with the execution case in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the limitation period correctly based on specific dates and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 744 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289874</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the period of limitation for filing the execution case should be counted from the date of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, determining the execution case filed within the twelve-year limitation period. The court set aside the previous order and directed the lower court to proceed with the execution case in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the limitation period correctly based on specific dates and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>