<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 124 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289873</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the respondent&#039;s election due to the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with Section 97 of the Representation of the People Act. The court ordered a recount of votes, revealing significant errors that reduced the initial majority in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in election petitions and highlighted the limited jurisdiction of election tribunals. The appellant was directed to cover the respondent&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 124 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289873</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the respondent&#039;s election due to the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with Section 97 of the Representation of the People Act. The court ordered a recount of votes, revealing significant errors that reduced the initial majority in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in election petitions and highlighted the limited jurisdiction of election tribunals. The appellant was directed to cover the respondent&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>