<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 681 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397738</link>
    <description>An entity established by Government and entrusted with project management and execution of an integrated water transport project was treated as a Governmental Authority because it was set up with full Government equity and performed functions linked to Municipality and Panchayat responsibilities. Its project-execution services were classified as pure services, not works contract or composite supply, and were rendered to the State Government in relation to municipal functions. Those services were therefore exempt under Entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), so GST was not payable on the project receipts and no GST invoice was required for the alleged transfer of assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 681 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397738</link>
      <description>An entity established by Government and entrusted with project management and execution of an integrated water transport project was treated as a Governmental Authority because it was set up with full Government equity and performed functions linked to Municipality and Panchayat responsibilities. Its project-execution services were classified as pure services, not works contract or composite supply, and were rendered to the State Government in relation to municipal functions. Those services were therefore exempt under Entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), so GST was not payable on the project receipts and no GST invoice was required for the alleged transfer of assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>