<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 673 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397730</link>
    <description>The ITAT Cuttack upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO regarding cash deposits treated as gifts and trade receipts. The tribunal stressed the need to establish transaction genuineness and adhere to tax laws. The appeal was dismissed due to the low tax effect, aligning with CBDT Circular No.17/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 673 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397730</link>
      <description>The ITAT Cuttack upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO regarding cash deposits treated as gifts and trade receipts. The tribunal stressed the need to establish transaction genuineness and adhere to tax laws. The appeal was dismissed due to the low tax effect, aligning with CBDT Circular No.17/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>