<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Authorities Incorrectly Classified Software Development Costs as Capital Expenditure; Additions Deleted by Higher Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54503</link>
    <description>Nature of expenditure - A.O. as well as the Ld. CIT(A) were erred in coming to the conclusion that expenditure incurred on developing new software platform is expected to give enduring benefit and one can recognise the intellectual property in the same to come to conclusion that expenditure incurred for development of new software platform is capital in nature. - Additions deleted - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:44:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Authorities Incorrectly Classified Software Development Costs as Capital Expenditure; Additions Deleted by Higher Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54503</link>
      <description>Nature of expenditure - A.O. as well as the Ld. CIT(A) were erred in coming to the conclusion that expenditure incurred on developing new software platform is expected to give enduring benefit and one can recognise the intellectual property in the same to come to conclusion that expenditure incurred for development of new software platform is capital in nature. - Additions deleted - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:44:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>