<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 129 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289871</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, highlighting that the petitioner&#039;s conduct of evading tax liability disqualified him from relief under article 226. The court did not delve into specific legal arguments raised by the petitioner, as his conduct was deemed sufficient to deny relief. The petition was rejected with costs, and the advocate&#039;s fee was fixed at Rs. 100.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 129 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289871</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, highlighting that the petitioner&#039;s conduct of evading tax liability disqualified him from relief under article 226. The court did not delve into specific legal arguments raised by the petitioner, as his conduct was deemed sufficient to deny relief. The petition was rejected with costs, and the advocate&#039;s fee was fixed at Rs. 100.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>