<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 668 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of bad debts claimed by the appellant, directing a reassessment due to discrepancies in evidence. It emphasized aligning tax liability computation with the revised return figures for accuracy. The appeal for waiver of interest charges under sections 234 A, 234 B &amp;amp; 234 D was allowed for statistical purposes, without detailed analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 668 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of bad debts claimed by the appellant, directing a reassessment due to discrepancies in evidence. It emphasized aligning tax liability computation with the revised return figures for accuracy. The appeal for waiver of interest charges under sections 234 A, 234 B &amp;amp; 234 D was allowed for statistical purposes, without detailed analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>