<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397721</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal regarding the assessment of unexplained cash credits in bank deposits, directing deletion of the addition. However, the levy of interest under section 234B was upheld as mandatory. The judgment emphasized the evidence presented by the assessee and legal arguments on the treatment of cash deposits and interest levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397721</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal regarding the assessment of unexplained cash credits in bank deposits, directing deletion of the addition. However, the levy of interest under section 234B was upheld as mandatory. The judgment emphasized the evidence presented by the assessee and legal arguments on the treatment of cash deposits and interest levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>