<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 651 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397708</link>
    <description>The Appellant, an employee of the company, alleged mismanagement and irregularities, seeking an investigation into the company&#039;s affairs under Section 213 (b) (ii) of the Companies Act 2013. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claims of fraud and misconduct, the NCLT dismissed the petition, labeling it as mala fide. The Appellant&#039;s appeal was also unsuccessful, with the Appellate Tribunal upholding the NCLT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for substantial grounds and evidence in such cases. The eligibility of a Public Sector Undertaking employee to file under Section 213 (b) (ii) was questioned but ultimately deemed unwarranted in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:03:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 651 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397708</link>
      <description>The Appellant, an employee of the company, alleged mismanagement and irregularities, seeking an investigation into the company&#039;s affairs under Section 213 (b) (ii) of the Companies Act 2013. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claims of fraud and misconduct, the NCLT dismissed the petition, labeling it as mala fide. The Appellant&#039;s appeal was also unsuccessful, with the Appellate Tribunal upholding the NCLT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for substantial grounds and evidence in such cases. The eligibility of a Public Sector Undertaking employee to file under Section 213 (b) (ii) was questioned but ultimately deemed unwarranted in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>