<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 10 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23071</link>
    <description>Borrowed moneys taken from financial institutions, banks and unsecured lenders were not includible in the capital computation base for relief under section 80J read with rule 19A. The Bombay HC applied the Supreme Court ruling in Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India, which settled that borrowed funds fall outside the relevant capital base for this computation. The includibility of the borrowed sums was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 10 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23071</link>
      <description>Borrowed moneys taken from financial institutions, banks and unsecured lenders were not includible in the capital computation base for relief under section 80J read with rule 19A. The Bombay HC applied the Supreme Court ruling in Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India, which settled that borrowed funds fall outside the relevant capital base for this computation. The includibility of the borrowed sums was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>