<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 639 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397696</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Reserve Bank of India&#039;s calculation of the petitioner&#039;s Net Owned Fund at Rs. 150.33 Lakhs, dismissing the writ petition. It affirmed the cancellation of the Certificate of Registration under Section 45-IA(6)(iv) of the RBI Act, emphasizing that the NOF must be calculated as per statutory provisions. The court ruled that the petitioner was not entitled to further opportunity to rectify the deficiency, as the RBI had already specified the requirement and given sufficient time for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 639 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397696</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Reserve Bank of India&#039;s calculation of the petitioner&#039;s Net Owned Fund at Rs. 150.33 Lakhs, dismissing the writ petition. It affirmed the cancellation of the Certificate of Registration under Section 45-IA(6)(iv) of the RBI Act, emphasizing that the NOF must be calculated as per statutory provisions. The court ruled that the petitioner was not entitled to further opportunity to rectify the deficiency, as the RBI had already specified the requirement and given sufficient time for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>