<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2130 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that only investments generating exempted income should be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The orders of the lower authorities disallowing the entire investment were set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer to limit the disallowance to investments yielding exempted income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2130 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that only investments generating exempted income should be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The orders of the lower authorities disallowing the entire investment were set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer to limit the disallowance to investments yielding exempted income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>