<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1432 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act applies to strategic investments in subsidiaries. It disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s interpretation of Rule 8D(2)(iii) and emphasized that only investments resulting in exempted income should be considered for disallowance. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to identify such investments and decide accordingly, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1432 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act applies to strategic investments in subsidiaries. It disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s interpretation of Rule 8D(2)(iii) and emphasized that only investments resulting in exempted income should be considered for disallowance. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to identify such investments and decide accordingly, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>