https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289865 An unregistered lease deed for a term exceeding one year could not be used to prove the contractual terms, though it could be considered to identify the character of possession. On the admitted facts, the lease had been fixed for fifteen years and expired by efflux of time under Section 111(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The lessee's continued occupation thereafter was only as a tenant at sufferance, so no notice terminating the tenancy under Section 106 was required before filing the suit for possession. The absence of such notice therefore did not affect maintainability. en-us Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289865 An unregistered lease deed for a term exceeding one year could not be used to prove the contractual terms, though it could be considered to identify the character of possession. On the admitted facts, the lease had been fixed for fifteen years and expired by efflux of time under Section 111(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The lessee's continued occupation thereafter was only as a tenant at sufferance, so no notice terminating the tenancy under Section 106 was required before filing the suit for possession. The absence of such notice therefore did not affect maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289865