https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397688 The court allowed the amendment of the writ petition challenging the constitutionality and legality of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Rule 126 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, granting respondents time to file counter-affidavits. In a related matter, constitutional validity and legality issues regarding Section 171 of the CGST Act and Rules 126, 127, and 133 of the CGST Rules were noted, leading to the issuance of notice to the Attorney General. Both parties agreed to frame issues and set timelines for further proceedings, with the case scheduled for final hearing on a specified date. en-us Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:46:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397688 The court allowed the amendment of the writ petition challenging the constitutionality and legality of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Rule 126 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, granting respondents time to file counter-affidavits. In a related matter, constitutional validity and legality issues regarding Section 171 of the CGST Act and Rules 126, 127, and 133 of the CGST Rules were noted, leading to the issuance of notice to the Attorney General. Both parties agreed to frame issues and set timelines for further proceedings, with the case scheduled for final hearing on a specified date. Case-Laws GST Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397688