https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397687 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the immediate release of the detained consignment of lubricant oil and vehicle. The court found the reasons for detention insufficient under Section 129 of the GST Act, emphasizing that the discrepancies in the e-way bill and tax collection did not warrant the detention. The petitioner's argument regarding the consignee's GSTIN on the invoice and the tax mention in the delivery challan being a mistake was accepted. The court deemed the detention unjustified and instructed prompt clearance upon presentation of the judgment to the authorities. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397687 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the immediate release of the detained consignment of lubricant oil and vehicle. The court found the reasons for detention insufficient under Section 129 of the GST Act, emphasizing that the discrepancies in the e-way bill and tax collection did not warrant the detention. The petitioner's argument regarding the consignee's GSTIN on the invoice and the tax mention in the delivery challan being a mistake was accepted. The court deemed the detention unjustified and instructed prompt clearance upon presentation of the judgment to the authorities. Case-Laws GST Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397687