<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (8) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289863</link>
    <description>A society registered under the Societies Registration Act is treated as a corporation with a legal existence separate from its members, and it may sue and be sued in its own corporate capacity. On that basis, the objection that it lacked corporate status was rejected, and the lower court&#039;s view on the effect of Act IV of 1938 was upheld. The society therefore remained capable of being regarded as a corporation for the relevant legal purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (8) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289863</link>
      <description>A society registered under the Societies Registration Act is treated as a corporation with a legal existence separate from its members, and it may sue and be sued in its own corporate capacity. On that basis, the objection that it lacked corporate status was rejected, and the lower court&#039;s view on the effect of Act IV of 1938 was upheld. The society therefore remained capable of being regarded as a corporation for the relevant legal purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>