https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289861 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the insolvent's property in India vested in the Official Assignee of Penang from the date of adjudication, making the subsequent attachment ineffective. The court emphasized the principle of comity of nations and the need to prevent interference with the process of universal distribution of assets, ultimately upholding the decision that the attachment was invalid and ordering costs to be paid. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 1933 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:16:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289861 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the insolvent's property in India vested in the Official Assignee of Penang from the date of adjudication, making the subsequent attachment ineffective. The court emphasized the principle of comity of nations and the need to prevent interference with the process of universal distribution of assets, ultimately upholding the decision that the attachment was invalid and ordering costs to be paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Oct 1933 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289861