<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 59 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23065</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to answer the question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the taxation of unpaid tax collected in the last month of the previous year under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the amended provisions of section 43B and Explanation 2 to determine the tax treatment of such unpaid amounts and directed the Tribunal to reexamine the appeals in light of the amended law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 59 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23065</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to answer the question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the taxation of unpaid tax collected in the last month of the previous year under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the amended provisions of section 43B and Explanation 2 to determine the tax treatment of such unpaid amounts and directed the Tribunal to reexamine the appeals in light of the amended law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>