https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397683 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Ext.P11 order under the GST Act, and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter. The respondent was instructed to provide the petitioner with relevant documents, allow cross-examination of individuals, and address previously unconsidered objections. The petitioner was required to participate in the fresh proceedings, with a three-month deadline for the respondent to issue new orders. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness, the right to be heard, and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax dispute resolution. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397683 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Ext.P11 order under the GST Act, and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter. The respondent was instructed to provide the petitioner with relevant documents, allow cross-examination of individuals, and address previously unconsidered objections. The petitioner was required to participate in the fresh proceedings, with a three-month deadline for the respondent to issue new orders. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness, the right to be heard, and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax dispute resolution. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397683