https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289850 Renewal of a cinema licence under the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970 depended on the applicant satisfying the renewal conditions, including lawful possession of the theatre premises. A lease that ended by efflux of time left the tenant without lawful possession, and continued occupation without the lessor's assent did not amount to holding over under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The occupation might remain protected against forcible dispossession, but it was not lawful possession for renewal purposes. Because the lease terms required vacant possession on expiry, the applicant did not meet the renewal requirement and the licence renewal was refused. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289850 Renewal of a cinema licence under the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970 depended on the applicant satisfying the renewal conditions, including lawful possession of the theatre premises. A lease that ended by efflux of time left the tenant without lawful possession, and continued occupation without the lessor's assent did not amount to holding over under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The occupation might remain protected against forcible dispossession, but it was not lawful possession for renewal purposes. Because the lease terms required vacant possession on expiry, the applicant did not meet the renewal requirement and the licence renewal was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289850