https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289845 A statutory university, though aided by the State, was treated as outside Article 12 because it was not maintained by the State and did not perform governmental functions, so Article 15(1) did not directly govern its regulations. For admissions to educational institutions, Article 29(2) was treated as the specific controlling provision rather than Article 15(1), with the omission of sex regarded as deliberate. Regulations requiring prior sanction and adequate facilities before women students could be admitted were held to regulate co-education and educational conditions, not to impose sex-based exclusion, and were upheld as non-discriminatory. en-us Fri, 01 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:55:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289845 A statutory university, though aided by the State, was treated as outside Article 12 because it was not maintained by the State and did not perform governmental functions, so Article 15(1) did not directly govern its regulations. For admissions to educational institutions, Article 29(2) was treated as the specific controlling provision rather than Article 15(1), with the omission of sex regarded as deliberate. Regulations requiring prior sanction and adequate facilities before women students could be admitted were held to regulate co-education and educational conditions, not to impose sex-based exclusion, and were upheld as non-discriminatory. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289845