<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397650</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the additions towards unexplained share capital and disallowances of depreciation and expenses. The ITAT emphasized the importance of linking additions in block assessments to incriminating evidence found during searches and the necessity of substantiating claims with adequate documentation. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was dismissed due to significant delay without proper explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397650</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the additions towards unexplained share capital and disallowances of depreciation and expenses. The ITAT emphasized the importance of linking additions in block assessments to incriminating evidence found during searches and the necessity of substantiating claims with adequate documentation. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was dismissed due to significant delay without proper explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>