<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 587 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Assessing Officer regarding the ex-parte order, best judgment assessment order, and addition of unexplained investments under section 69B of the Act. The Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed as they failed to provide new evidence or challenge the authorities&#039; decisions, leading to the confirmation of additions made by the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 587 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Assessing Officer regarding the ex-parte order, best judgment assessment order, and addition of unexplained investments under section 69B of the Act. The Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed as they failed to provide new evidence or challenge the authorities&#039; decisions, leading to the confirmation of additions made by the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>