<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 579 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397636</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal upheld penalties totaling &amp;amp;8377; 27,09,000/- on each Appellant for continuous violations of Sections 166 and 96 of the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013. Despite considering mitigating circumstances, the Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, emphasizing consistency in compounding offenses and the penalty&#039;s appropriateness in light of the violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 579 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397636</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal upheld penalties totaling &amp;amp;8377; 27,09,000/- on each Appellant for continuous violations of Sections 166 and 96 of the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013. Despite considering mitigating circumstances, the Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, emphasizing consistency in compounding offenses and the penalty&#039;s appropriateness in light of the violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>