https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289840 Custody pursuant to a judicial remand order passed by a court of competent jurisdiction is not illegal detention and cannot be challenged through habeas corpus; any error in remand must be pursued in appropriate revisional or appellate proceedings. The High Court's supervisory powers under Articles 226 and 227, read with Section 483 CrPC, do not support a blanket direction to release minors who elope and claim marriage of their choice. The margin of error principle in age determination cannot be used to treat a girl child as major in elopement cases, and placement of a minor in a Protection Home, After-Care Home, Remand Home or Nari Niketan under judicial order is not illegal confinement. The writ petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:51:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289840 Custody pursuant to a judicial remand order passed by a court of competent jurisdiction is not illegal detention and cannot be challenged through habeas corpus; any error in remand must be pursued in appropriate revisional or appellate proceedings. The High Court's supervisory powers under Articles 226 and 227, read with Section 483 CrPC, do not support a blanket direction to release minors who elope and claim marriage of their choice. The margin of error principle in age determination cannot be used to treat a girl child as major in elopement cases, and placement of a minor in a Protection Home, After-Care Home, Remand Home or Nari Niketan under judicial order is not illegal confinement. The writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289840