https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289837 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should be exercised with restraint at the investigation stage, particularly where disputed facts remain unresolved and police investigation is ordinarily within the executive domain. The court should not normally control the manner of investigation or substitute its own procedure, but interference may be justified where there is prima facie illegality, abuse of process, or material indicating mala fides. On the facts noted, prior hostility, an earlier final report, a changed prosecutorial view, and the minor nature of the alleged breach supported interim protection, and the petitioner's arrest was stayed pending further affidavits and consideration. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:18:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289837 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should be exercised with restraint at the investigation stage, particularly where disputed facts remain unresolved and police investigation is ordinarily within the executive domain. The court should not normally control the manner of investigation or substitute its own procedure, but interference may be justified where there is prima facie illegality, abuse of process, or material indicating mala fides. On the facts noted, prior hostility, an earlier final report, a changed prosecutorial view, and the minor nature of the alleged breach supported interim protection, and the petitioner's arrest was stayed pending further affidavits and consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289837