<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 575 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397632</link>
    <description>A debtor-initiated insolvency petition under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found not maintainable where the surrounding material indicated fraudulent or malicious intent and an attempt to defeat creditor claims. The Appellate Tribunal noted that separate penal action under Section 65 had not been imposed, but that did not prevent rejection of the application itself. It also left open independent allegations concerning solvency and siphoning of funds for consideration before the appropriate company authorities. The debtor&#039;s insolvency petition was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 575 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397632</link>
      <description>A debtor-initiated insolvency petition under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found not maintainable where the surrounding material indicated fraudulent or malicious intent and an attempt to defeat creditor claims. The Appellate Tribunal noted that separate penal action under Section 65 had not been imposed, but that did not prevent rejection of the application itself. It also left open independent allegations concerning solvency and siphoning of funds for consideration before the appropriate company authorities. The debtor&#039;s insolvency petition was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>