<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1257 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289831</link>
    <description>Individual notice in land acquisition proceedings is required for persons known or reasonably identifiable as interested from the revenue records; the Collector is not bound to conduct a roving enquiry to locate every possible vested remainderman, and omission to notify a person not recorded does not invalidate the acquisition on that ground. A direction for criminal prosecution for alleged fraud on the court can be made only where fraud or another cognizable offence is clearly established and the governing criminal procedure is followed. On the material described, the notice requirement was not extended to unrecorded vested remaindermen, while the prosecution direction was unjustified and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1257 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289831</link>
      <description>Individual notice in land acquisition proceedings is required for persons known or reasonably identifiable as interested from the revenue records; the Collector is not bound to conduct a roving enquiry to locate every possible vested remainderman, and omission to notify a person not recorded does not invalidate the acquisition on that ground. A direction for criminal prosecution for alleged fraud on the court can be made only where fraud or another cognizable offence is clearly established and the governing criminal procedure is followed. On the material described, the notice requirement was not extended to unrecorded vested remaindermen, while the prosecution direction was unjustified and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>