https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289828 A habeas corpus petition was treated as unavailable to secure release of an undertrial in a TADA prosecution where the complaints concerned remand, adjournments, and trial delay. The special statute was regarded as a self-contained code for proceedings before the Designated Court, with the CrPC applying only to the extent permitted by the Act. Those grievances were to be pursued before the Designated Court and, where appropriate, through the statute's appellate route to the Supreme Court. Article 21's right to speedy trial was recognised, but it did not by itself justify automatic release or displace the special statutory forum absent clear illegality. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:01:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289828 A habeas corpus petition was treated as unavailable to secure release of an undertrial in a TADA prosecution where the complaints concerned remand, adjournments, and trial delay. The special statute was regarded as a self-contained code for proceedings before the Designated Court, with the CrPC applying only to the extent permitted by the Act. Those grievances were to be pursued before the Designated Court and, where appropriate, through the statute's appellate route to the Supreme Court. Article 21's right to speedy trial was recognised, but it did not by itself justify automatic release or displace the special statutory forum absent clear illegality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289828