<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1886 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the raw materials supplied by the applicant, held under a contractual arrangement and trust, are not considered &quot;assets&quot; under Section 18(1)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Interim Resolution Professional cannot take control and custody of these materials. The Tribunal ordered the return of the raw materials to the applicant, allowing the application (CA 206/2019 in CP 102/2018).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:59:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1886 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the raw materials supplied by the applicant, held under a contractual arrangement and trust, are not considered &quot;assets&quot; under Section 18(1)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Interim Resolution Professional cannot take control and custody of these materials. The Tribunal ordered the return of the raw materials to the applicant, allowing the application (CA 206/2019 in CP 102/2018).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>